|
in
the Monitor Newspaper
October 10, 2003
This week I am starting the case for
saving Christopher. I have no apologies if readers find the
language sometimes hard. But, like Stephen Lewis (UN
Secretary-General's Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa) noted
in January this year after his tour of Southern Africa, “...,
the time for polite, even agitated entreaties is over.” Our
present times are no longer the age of timeworn politeness or
civility, simply because we are living in times of impunity and
hypocrisy.
The citizenry and indeed all that
dwells on this planet must realise that democracy, the very much
touted commodity of governance in the 21st century is
slowly becoming the yoke of our enslavement, debasement and
impoverishment. This is done with impunity, mostly, because we
still have inane and absurd believes of respect, when
politicians (in government and the opposition) do not show any
iota of respect for the citizenry.
The power that as a people we have
over politicians does not seem to be realised. It is absurd of
people to kow-tow before and after politicians. A politician
does not feed you, nor do you owe him or her your servitude. It
is the politician that actually owes you his or her servitude.
Lest you forgot, a politician is
just as ordinary as yourself, only difference is, this is an
individual that seeks to represent you (and the ideals you
subscribe to) in your everyday interaction with the State. And
not a single individual, other than a dictator, can represent
you without your sanction. Consequently, it is irresponsible to
sanction someone to represent you, and then allow them to behave
with impunity and in a manner that kills Christopher.
That in this century, our
relationship to our representation is that of servitude, is
because as a people we accept and sustain impunity and
hypocrisy.
Okay, so there are no WMDs in Iraq.
Of course, there were no WMDs, except the ones in Collin
Powell’s PowerPoint presentation at the UN. George and Tony
being allowed impunity could not differentiate a PowerPoint
presentation from reality, so they went looking for things that
only existed in a presentation. Any way, forget global
impunity, hypocrisy and idiocy, it rarely saves Christopher, and
that is fact.
How about on the home front?
Children are being defiled at an alarming rate, so every Tom,
Dick and Harry says, and the media is having a field day. Last
week, there was even a protest march. Members of civil society,
politicians and yes, children went to air their grievances to Mr
or Mrs. Freedom Statue along Independence Avenue in Lusaka. They
went to tell him/her, that the law on defilement should be
stiffened, defilers should be castrated, and so many other blah
blahs.
Without seeming to minimise the
problem of child abuse and in particular defilement, from beyond
politics, the fact is the Freedom Statue is not the entity to
which such grievances or protests should be addressed. As more
grey hairs pop up on my head, understanding humans, is becoming
an exercise in futility. It is clear the act of doing anything
right in this country is shockingly far-fetched. Could be that
is why, even our governance is in a serious mess. Or it could
be, ‘being seen’ or the ‘wannabe’ syndrome is inadvertently now
a state of our existence.
I was asked if I would march, and I
said yes. But when I was told we would be protesting at Freedom
Statue, the meaningless of the protest was evident and not worth
participating in.
The protest march should have been
to State House, cabinet or parliament, and not a damn statue.
Could be we respect politicians so much that we seek not to
disturb their peace in their places of work, so we humbly march
to a statue. What impunity!
Impunity is a crime. The
perpetuation of impunity by parties affected by impunity is also
a crime. It is absurd that this country’s citizenry continually
behave in a manner that not only perpetuates impunity, but also
sustains and nourishes it.
Our everyday existence as Zambians
is riddled with impunity. Walk into any service providers’ place
(public or private), in over 99 per cent of the cases, the
service provider at the other end of the table or counter will
look at you like you are lost, or you are simply wasting their
time. Tragically, the majority of Zambians seeking the service
that took them there will simply timidly take the nonsense.
How often have you walked into your
Bank, and you have been subjected to a wait of over half an
hour, just because despite the Bank wasting money on
constructing 10 counters or so, most of the time only 50% of the
counters provide service.
In our understanding of the effect
of impunity and hypocrisy, the answer that always fails us is
how we contain impunity and hypocrisy in our poorest of the poor
country.
From beyond politics, the answer is
simple.
All donors and supposed
international development agencies should vacate the nation
space defined as the state of Zambia. Donors and supposed
international development agencies have been round this country
since the time I used to believe James Brown was cool, yet zilch
has been done to change Christopher’s plight.
All civil society leaders that claim
to fight for what is just, should shut up. Just is not about
politicians and the State. Just is about Christopher.
All politicians that exhibit
monkey-like tendencies of swinging from branch to branch under
the misguided assumption that it is only by being in the ruling
party that one can contribute to the development of this poorest
of the poor countries should be weeded.
All presidents that parade such
individuals as saviours should be impeached.
Lest I forget, in addition, all
politicians holding government office should relinquish their
office and vamoose. All civil servants who owe allegiance to the
president should be arrested. They are a travesty of the
expectations of a civil servant.
Take away the franchise from all
citizens that continue voting for individuals that exhibit
monkey-like behaviours, such citizens are demented and not
worthy the right to the franchise. These individuals simply
epitomise the likely dangers of democracy of rule by the
majority through mediocrity. The franchise should be the
preserve of reasoning individuals.
So Mr. Liato, Tetamashimba retained
their seats, and the MMD is asserting its political hegemony.
Who cares, after all a one party state is what appeals to the
citizenry? Mr. Imenda was allowed to contest his seat despite
the courts affirming that his last election was fraudulent. Can
not fault him, after all the continued adherence to illegitimate
laws allowed him. So again, who cares?
Indeed, who cares? Catch part two
next week, and do not forget to touch a child today.
|